Flemish Region (Belgium)

Country overview

Select a country to explore its education data and publications.


Flemish Region (Belgium)
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2024)
  • In the Flemish Community of Belgium, teachers are on average 40 years old, which is lower than the OECD average of 45 years. Since 2018, the share of teachers aged 50 and above has not changed.
  • Just over a third of teachers, 38%, have non-teaching work experience (lower than the OECD average: 57%).
  • Schools where more than 10% of students have a first language different from the language of instruction employ 62% of teachers (higher than the OECD average: 25%). The share of teachers who feel they can adapt their teaching to cultural diversity “quite a bit” or “a lot” is 61% (similar to the OECD average: 63%).
  • Three out of four teachers, 75%, feel they can support students’ social and emotional learning “quite a bit” or “a lot” (similar to the OECD average: 73%).
  • At least one hybrid or online lesson in the last month was reported in schools where 38% of teachers work (higher than the OECD average: 16%).
  • Just under two out of five teachers, 39%, report having used artificial intelligence (AI) in their work (similar to the OECD average: 36%).
  • Among novice teachers (with up to five years of experience), 40% have an assigned mentor (higher than the OECD average: 26%). This share has not changed since 2018.
  • A total of 57% of teachers report that the professional learning activities they participated in during the previous 12 months had a positive impact on their teaching (similar to the OECD average: 55%).
  • The most frequent forms of collaboration among teachers include: exchanging teaching materials (69%), engaging in discussions about the learning development of specific students (33%), and teaching jointly as a team in the same class (30%).
  • In the Flemish Community of Belgium, 21% of teachers “agree” or “strongly agree” that teachers are valued in society (similar to the OECD average: 22%). This share decreased by 4 percentage points since 2018.
  • Nearly two-thirds of teachers, 62%, “agree” or “strongly agree” that they are satisfied with their terms of employment, excluding salaries (lower than the OECD average: 68%). Satisfaction has decreased by 5 percentage points since 2018.
  • Just over seven out of ten teachers, 71%, “agree” or “strongly agree” that they are satisfied with their salaries (higher than the OECD average: 39%). This share has not changed since 2018.
  • The most commonly reported sources of stress are: having too much administrative work (75%), keeping up with changing requirements from authorities (64%), and keeping up with curriculum or programme changes (53%).
  • The share of teachers who report that, all in all, they are satisfied with their jobs is 93% (higher than the OECD average: 89%). This has not changed since 2018.
  • Among teachers under age 30, 7% express their intention of leaving teaching within the next five years (lower than the OECD average: 20%). This share has not changed since 2018.
  • In the Flemish Community of Belgium, the share of principals who report that, all in all, they are satisfied with their job is 92% (similar to the OECD average: 94%). The share of principals satisfied with their jobs did not change between 2018 and 2024 (the OECD average decreased by 2 percentage points during the same period).
  • Over 60% of principals are satisfied with their salary (higher than the OECD average: 49%). Between 2018 and 2024, the share of principals who are satisfied with their salary did not change (the OECD average increased by 6 percentage points during the same period).
  • 55% of principals are satisfied with their non-salary employment terms (lower than the OECD average: 66%). Between 2018 and 2024, the share of principals who are satisfied with their non-salary employment terms did not change (the OECD average did not change during the same period).
  • In the Flemish Community of Belgium, 44% of principals observed instruction in the classroom ‘often’ or ‘very often’ in the 12 months prior to the survey (similar to the OECD average: 49%), and 51% gave feedback to teachers based on their observation (similar to the OECD average: 56%). Between 2018 and 2024, classroom observation by principals increased by 16 percentage points (the OECD average increased by 7 percentage points during the same period).
  • Around 81% of principals use teachers’ school- and classroom-based results as part of formal teacher appraisal (higher than the OECD average: 62%). Between 2018 and 2024, the use of school- and classroom-based results as part of formal teacher appraisal did not change (the OECD average decreased by 9 percentage points during the same period).
  • In the Flemish Community of Belgium, 94% of principals report that students have opportunities to actively participate in school decisions (higher than the OECD average: 85%). Between 2018 and 2024, the share of principals reporting that their school enables students to participate in school decisions did not change (the OECD average increased by 6 percentage points during the same period).

* Estimates for Alberta (Canada), the Netherlands, New Zealand and Norway should be interpreted with caution due to higher risk of non-response bias.

Select first some countries to compare, choose the charts you wish to display and customise them.

The following list displays indicators for which your selected country shows the highest and lowest values among countries. The list can be sorted by level of education or by age group. All rankings are calculated including available data from OECD and partner countries. Find out more about the methodology here.

Show indicators for which your country ranks among the top or bottom: Sort by:

Who the principals are

Principals in Flemish Region (Belgium) are on average younger than principals in most other TALIS countries. (47.9 %, rank 51/55 , 2024) Download Indicator

Initial and induction training of teachers

The percentage of recently appointed lower secondary teachers in Flemish Region (Belgium) who reported taking part in either formal or informal induction in their school was among the highest across countries with available data. (95.1 %, rank 3/55 , 2024) Download Indicator

ICT for teaching

In Flemish Region (Belgium), the share of lower secondary teachers reporting a high level of need for skills in using artificial intelligence for teaching and learning was among the smallest compared to other countries. (14 %, rank 54/55 , 2024) Download Indicator

The percentage of novice lower secondary teachers in Flemish Region (Belgium) reporting a high level of need for skills in using artificial intelligence for teaching and learning was among the lowest across countries with available data. (13.1 %, rank 55/55 , 2024) Download Indicator

In Flemish Region (Belgium), the share of lower secondary principals who report that the school's capacity to provide quality instruction is hindered by a shortage or inadequacy of digital resources and tools for instruction is among the smallest across participating countries. (3.6 %, rank 51/55 , 2024) Download Indicator

Teaching students with special needs

A smaller proportion of teachers report a high level of need to develop their skills to teach students with special needs. (12.4 %, rank 53/55 , 2024) Download Indicator

The proportion of novice lower secondary teachers in Flemish Region (Belgium) who reported a high level of need for teaching students with special education needs was among the lowest compared to other countries. (16.2 %, rank 55/55 , 2024) Download Indicator

Teachers' autonomy, collegiality and collaboration

Compared to most other TALIS countries, Flemish Region (Belgium) has a lower proportion of teachers who participate in collaborative professional learning in their school at least once a month. (7.6 %, rank 51/55 , 2024) Download Indicator

Among lower secondary teachers in Flemish Region (Belgium), those engaging in discussions about the learning development of specific students at least once a month were among the lowest across countries with available data. (33.2 %, rank 53/55 , 2024) Download Indicator

In Flemish Region (Belgium), the proportion of lower secondary teachers collaborating with parents and guardians at least once a month to enrich students’ learning activities was among the smallest across countries with available data. (6 %, rank 53/55 , 2024) Download Indicator

Teachers' satisfaction with their jobs

Compared to most other TALIS countries, Flemish Region (Belgium) has a high proportion of teachers who are satisfied with the salary they receive for their work. (71.2 %, rank 5/55 , 2024) Download Indicator

Teachers’ working conditions, mobility and risk of attrition

For a large share of teachers, having too much administrative work is a source of stress. (75.5 %, rank 2/55 , 2024) Download Indicator

The proportion of lower secondary teachers working part-time in Flemish Region (Belgium) was among the largest across countries with available data. (36 %, rank 5/55 , 2024) Download Indicator

The proportion of lower secondary teachers in Flemish Region (Belgium) working in schools where intimidation or verbal abuse occurs “weekly” or “daily” was among the highest across countries with available data. (15.2 %, rank 3/55 , 2024) Download Indicator

Teacher stress factors

The share of lower secondary teachers in Flemish Region (Belgium) reporting stress due to having too many lessons to teach was among the lowest across countries with available data. (12.2 %, rank 54/55 , 2024) Download Indicator

The percentage of lower secondary teachers in Flemish Region (Belgium) who reported stress from keeping up with changing requirements from authorities was among the highest across countries with available data. (64.2 %, rank 5/55 , 2024) Download Indicator


The data table will display up to six selected countries.
General findings

                        
  • Teachers are aging in many education systems. While the average age of teachers is around 45 years old, more than one out of two teachers are 50 or older.
  • Prior non-teaching work experience is more and more common for teachers. In around half of the education systems, at least one out of two teachers have prior non-teaching work experience.
Visualisations
Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables

                        
  • Around one in three teachers report having used artificial intelligence (AI) in their work, on average across OECD education systems.
  • Many teachers – especially female and experienced teachers – report meeting key lesson aims, though supporting students' social and emotional learning remains challenging.
Visualisations
Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables

                        
  • The large majority of teachers are satisfied with their profession, which indicates that most teachers find meaning and personal fulfilment in their work. Almost nine in ten teachers report that they are satisfied with their jobs overall.
  • Administrative workload remains a considerable demand for teachers. About half of teachers report excessive administrative work as a source of work-related stress, particularly those with more than ten years of experience.
  • Discipline and behaviour issues as sources of stress are important predictors of teachers’ fulfilment of their lesson aims, their well-being, job satisfaction and their intention to leave teaching. About one in five teachers report experiencing significant disruptive noise and disorder in their classrooms, and the share of time spent on maintaining discipline has increased since 2018.
  • Teachers are spending more time working together compared to 2018. Full-time teachers report spending around 3 hours per week participating in teamwork and dialogue with colleagues. Teachers who report good professional relationships with principals, other teachers, parents and guardians, and students tend to report higher well-being and job satisfaction.
Visualisations
Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables

                        
  • Administrative workload remains a considerable demand for teachers. About half of teachers report excessive administrative work as a source of work-related stress, particularly those with more than ten years of experience.
  • Discipline and behaviour issues as sources of stress are important predictors of teachers’ fulfilment of their lesson aims, their well-being, job satisfaction and their intention to leave teaching. About one in five teachers report experiencing significant disruptive noise and disorder in their classrooms, and the share of time spent on maintaining discipline has increased since 2018.
  • Teachers’ satisfaction with their terms of employment (including salary) has increased in many education systems since 2018.
Visualisations
Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables

                        
  • Mentoring is gaining popularity. About one in four novice teachers (teachers with up to five years of teaching experience) has an assigned mentor.
  • While nearly all teachers participate in continuous professional learning, not all of them find that doing so has a positive impact on their teaching. Just 55% of teachers report that the professional learning activities they participated in during the 12 months preceding the survey had a positive impact on their teaching.
Visualisations
Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables

                        
  • Teachers are spending more time working together compared to 2018. Full-time teachers report spending around 3 hours per week participating in teamwork and dialogue with colleagues. Teachers who report good professional relationships with principals, other teachers, parents and guardians, and students tend to report higher well-being and job satisfaction.
Visualisations
Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables

                        
  • Feedback and appraisal are common features of teachers’ professional lives. On average across OECD education systems, 88% of teachers report receiving feedback from their school principal, 61% from assigned mentors and 55% from external individuals or bodies. At the same time, principals report that only less than 6% of teachers are never formally appraised.
Visualisations
Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables

                        
  • Across OECD countries, 93.8% of principals in lower secondary stated that they were satisfied with their job. However, only 49% reported being satisfied with the salary they receive for their work and 66% with their term of employment (excluding salaries).
  • On average, principals in lower secondary education are around 52 years old in OECD countries, and women represent 54.7% of them.
  • Principals can be quite stressed by administrative work. Indeed, 68.5% stated that it was the source of "quite" or "a lot" of stress.
Visualisations
Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
Key
Diagram of funding flows - Flemish Region (Belgium)

Click on the coverpage to see the full OECD iLibrary version
Key
Country Reviews for Flemish Region (Belgium)

Note: These values should be interpreted with care since they are influenced by countries' specific contexts and trade-offs. In education, there is often no simple most- or least-efficient model. For instance, the share of private expenditure in education must be read against other measures designed to mitigate inequities, such as loans and grants; longer learning time is an opportunity to convey more and better content to students, but may hinder investments in other important areas. If you want further information on the nature of different variables, please take the time to read the analysis and contextual information, available at the website for each publication.
All rankings for individual variables are compiled on the basis of OECD and G20 countries for which data are available. The OECD average includes only OECD countries which are listed here: https://www.oecd.org/en/about/members-partners.html

Reference years displayed in the Education GPS correspond to the most common year of reference among countries for which data is available on each variable. Data for the latest available year is preferred and some countries may have provided data refering to a more recent or late year. However, OECD averages from Education at a Glance coming from the OECD database are the averages for the indicator reference year appearing in the Education GPS and may differ from averages in the book where averages can include data from multiple reference years, based on countries' data availability.

To know more about possible exceptions on data please click on the "Download Indicator" link on each variable. When a year of reference corresponds to a school year encompassing two years, the reference reads as follows: 2026 for school year 2025/2026 in the Northern Hemisphere.

*TALIS averages are based on all countries participating in the TALIS survey, including partner countries and economies. This explains the difference between the OECD average and the TALIS averages. Data from the TALIS survey and Education at a Glance (EAG) may differ. See Annex E of the TALIS technical report and Sources Methodologies and Technical Notes of EAG 2025 for more details about the data collections.

For additional notes, please refer to annexes in the list of links below the introductory country profile text.