Data profiles
Choose a data profile by publication, topic or level of education, then explore and compare results through interactive charts and tables, refining by country, age, or educational level. Access data across all available countries —OECD and non-OECD— and create customized maps, graphs, and charts. Save your selection PDFs or embed the visualisations directly into your presentations and documents.
Explore by publication  By publication:
  • Education at a Glance 2025 (EAG 2025): Highlights   
  • EAG 2025, Part A: The output of educational institutions and the impact of learning   
  • EAG 2025, Part B: Access to education, participation and progression   
  • EAG 2025, Part C: Financial resources invested in education   
  • EAG 2025, Part D: Teachers, learning environment and organisation of schools   
  • Survey of Adult Skills 2023 (PIAAC)   
  • PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education   
  • PISA 2022 Results (Volume II): Learning During - and From - Disruption   
  • PISA 2022 Results (Volume III): Creative Minds, Creative Schools   
  • PISA 2022 Results (Volume V): Learning Strategies and Attitudes for Life   
  • PISA 2018 Results (Volume IV): Are Students Smart About Money?   
  • PISA 2018 Results (Volume VI): Are Students Ready to Thrive in an Interconnected World?   
  • PISA 2018: Are Students Ready To Take On Environmental Challenges?   
  • TALIS 2024: The State of Teaching   
  • TALIS 2024: Starting Strong Survey   
  • Explore by topic  By topic:
  • Student outcomes   
  • Collaborative Problem Solving   
  • Adult competencies   
  • Access & participation   
  • Student mobility   
  • Education attainment   
  • Education system & governance   
  • Evaluation & quality assurance   
  • Financing education   
  • Learning environment   
  • Students' well-being   
  • Equity   
  • Gender   
  • Digital divide   
  • Special needs   
  • Socio-economic status   
  • Migrant background   
  • Economic & social outcomes   
  • Teachers & educators   
  • Teacher practices   
  • Teacher initial education   
  • Teacher professional development   
  • Teacher employment   
  • Teacher working conditions   
  • Education leadership   
  • Future of education and skills   
  • Research & innovation   
  • Explore by level of education  By level of education:
  • Early childhood education & care   
  • Primary education   
  • Secondary education   
  • Vocational education & training (VET)   
  • Tertiary education   
  • Adult education   
  • Digital divide
  • According to PISA 2022, there is 0.81 computer per student in school on average across OECD countries. In Australia, Austria, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, the United States, El Salvador and Singapore, there is at least one computer per student. By contrast, in Albania, Baku (Azerbaijan), Brazil, Cambodia and Morocco, there is less than one computer per every five students.
  • Students in OECD countries spend on average 25 minutes per day on line at school. In Australia, Denmark, Greece and Sweden, they spend 39 or more minutes per day. By contrast, in Germany, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Korea, Macao, Poland, Shanghai, Singapore, Turkey and Uruguay, at least 50% of students reported never being on line at school.
  • Students in Australia, Brazil, Korea, Singapore, Sweden and the United States perform better in digital reading than in print reading.
  • On average, 38% of adults without computer experience and below upper secondary education are employed. The likelihood of being employed increases with each additional level of education and skills proficiency. The greatest returns associated with increased education and ICT and problem-solving skills are observed in Norway and Poland. In these countries, the odds ratio increases as skills improve, which is not the case in Estonia and the Slovak Republic.
  • Estonia, Hungary, Norway, Poland, Slovenia, Sweden and the United Arab Emirates have the widest gender gaps in digital reading.
  • The more frequently students play one-player video games and collaborative online games, the worse their relative performance on print reading. However, these negative effects may be counterbalanced by positive effects on their ability to navigate through digital texts.
  • In Australia, Chile, Denmark, Mexico, Norway and Abu Dhabi, more than one in two teachers reported that students use ICT "frequently" or "in all or nearly all lessons", while fewer than one in four teachers in Croatia, Finland, France, Israel, Japan, Malaysia and Serbia reported so.
  • Teachers ranked their professional development needs and cited teaching students with special needs first, followed by using ICT for teaching and using new technologies in the workplace. Larger proportions of teachers in Brazil, Italy and Malaysia reported so.
  • Around one in three teachers (36%) report having used artificial intelligence (AI) in their work, on average across OECD education systems. Around 75% of teachers in Singapore and the United Arab Emirates use AI in their work, whereas fewer than 20% of teachers do so in France and Japan.
  • Among lower secondary teachers, 17.7% reported a high need for professional development in ICT skills for teaching, while 60.4% had already included ICT in their recent professional development.
  • Select first some countries to compare, choose the chart you wish to display and customise them.

    Select OECD countries

    Australia
    Austria
    Belgium
    Flemish Region (Belgium)
    Belgium (French)
    Belgium (excl. Flemish)
    Canada
    Alberta (Canada)
    New Brunswick (Canada)
    Quebec (Canada)
    Canadian provinces
    Chile
    Colombia
    Costa Rica
    Czechia
    Denmark
    Estonia
    Finland
    France
    Germany
    Greece
    Hungary
    Iceland
    Ireland
    Israel
    Italy
    Japan
    Korea
    Latvia
    Lithuania
    Luxembourg
    Mexico
    Netherlands
    New Zealand
    Norway
    Poland
    Portugal
    Slovak Republic
    Slovenia
    Spain
    Sweden
    Switzerland
    Türkiye
    United Kingdom
    England (UK)
    Northern Ireland (UK)
    Scotland (UK)
    United States
    OECD average
    OECD total

    Non-OECD countries

    G20 average
    TALIS average
    TALIS avg. primary education
    TALIS avg. upper secondary education
    Albania
    Algeria
    Argentina
    Bahrain
    Buenos Aires (Argentina)
    Azerbaijan
    Baku (Azerbaijan)
    Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Brazil
    Brunei Darussalam
    Bulgaria
    Cambodia
    China
    B-S-J-Z (China)
    Hong Kong (China)
    Macao (China)
    Shanghai (China)
    Chinese Taipei
    Croatia
    Dominican Republic
    Ecuador
    El Salvador
    Georgia
    Guatemala
    India
    Indonesia
    Jamaica
    Jordan
    Kazakhstan
    Kosovo
    Lebanon
    North Macedonia
    Malaysia
    Malta
    Moldova
    Mongolia
    Montenegro
    Morocco
    Palestinian Authority
    Panama
    Paraguay
    Peru
    Philippines
    Qatar
    Romania
    Saudi Arabia
    Serbia
    Singapore
    South Africa
    Thailand
    Trinidad and Tobago
    Tunisia
    United Arab Emirates
    Abu Dhabi (UAE)
    Ukraine
    Uruguay
    Uzbekistan
    Viet Nam
    The data table will display up to four selected countries (unselect the OECD average to have one more).
    Click the arrows for more indicators:
    Click the arrows for more indicators:
    Click the arrows for more indicators:
    Click the arrows for more indicators:
    Country Profile quick links
    Note: These values should be interpreted with care since they are influenced by countries' specific contexts and trade-offs. In education, there is often no simple most- or least-efficient model. For instance, the share of private expenditure in education must be read against other measures designed to mitigate inequities, such as loans and grants; longer learning time is an opportunity to convey more and better content to students, but may hinder investments in other important areas. If you want further information on the nature of different variables, please take the time to read the analysis and contextual information, available at the website for each publication.
    The OECD average includes only OECD countries which are listed here: http://www.oecd.org/about/membersandpartners/

    Reference years displayed in the Education GPS correspond to the most common year of reference among countries for which data is available on each variable. Data for the latest available year is preferred and some countries may have provided data refering to a more recent or late year. To know more about possible exceptions on data please click on the "Download Indicator" link on each variable. When a year of reference corresponds to a school year encompassing two years, the reference reads as follows: 2025 for school year 2024/2025.

    *TALIS averages are based on all countries participating in the TALIS survey, including partner countries and economies. This explains the difference between the OECD average and the TALIS average. Data from the TALIS survey and Education at a Glance (EAG) may differ. See TALIS technical report and Education at a Glance sources methodologies and technical notes for more details about the data collections.

    For additional notes, please refer to annexes in the list of links below the introductory text.