Explore the OECD's reports or draw from a wide variety of education indicators and data to construct your own, customised country reports, highlighting the facts, developments and outcomes of your choice.

Country

Data profiles:



Jordan
Student performance (PISA 2022)
  • In mathematics, the main topic of PISA 2022, 15-year-olds in score 361 points compared to an average of 472 points in OECD countries.
  • On average, 15-year-olds score 342 points in reading compared to an average of 476 points in OECD countries.
  • In Jordan, the average performance in science of 15-year-olds is 375 points, compared to an average of 485 points in OECD countries.
  • Average 2022 results were down compared to 2018 in mathematics, and about the same as in 2018 in reading and science.
  • In Jordan, 17% of students attained at least Level 2 proficiency in mathematics, significantly less than on average across OECD countries (OECD average: 69%). At a minimum, these students can interpret and recognize, without direct instructions, how a simple situation can be represented mathematically
  • Almost no students in Jordan were top performers in mathematics, meaning that they attained Level 5 or 6 in the PISA mathematics test (OECD average: 9%).
  • In Jordan, 26% of students (the largest share) were in the 2nd international quintile of the socio-economic scale, meaning that they were neither among the most disadvantaged, nor among the most advantaged students who took the PISA test in 2022. Their average score in mathematics was 353 score points.
  • In Jordan socio-economically advantaged students (the top 25% in terms of socio-economic status) outperformed disadvantaged students (the bottom 25%) by 40 score points in mathematics. This is smaller than the average difference between the two groups (93 score points) across OECD countries.
  • Some 15% of disadvantaged students in Jordan were able to score in the top quarter of mathematics performance (OECD average: 10%). These students can be considered academically resilient.
  • Girls outperformed boys in mathematics by 15 score points and in reading by 46 score points in Jordan. Globally, in mathematics, boys outperformed girls in 40 countries and economies, girls outperformed boys in another 17 countries or economies. In reading, girls, on average, scored above boys in all but two countries and economies that participated in PISA 2022 (79 out of 81).
  • In mathematics, the average difference in performance between immigrant and non-immigrant students was not significant. After accounting for students' socio-economic profile, a significant difference of 10 score points in favour of immigrant students was observed.
  • In Jordan, 65% of students reported that their school building was closed for more than three months due to COVID-19. On average across OECD countries, 51% of students experienced similarly long school closures. In education systems where performance remained high and students' sense of belonging improved, fewer students experienced longer school closures.
  • In Jordan, 88% reported that they had attended pre-primary education for one year or more (OECD average: 94%).
  • Some 13% of students in Jordan reported that they had repeated a grade at least once (OECD average: 9%) after entering primary school. Grade repetition tends to be less prevalent in high performing systems.
  • Profile View

    Select first some countries to compare, choose the charts you wish to display and customise them.

    The following list displays indicators for which your selected country shows the highest and lowest values among countries. The list can be sorted by level of education or by age group. All rankings are calculated including available data from OECD and partner countries. Find out more about the methodology here.

    Show indicators for which your country ranks among the top or bottom: Sort by:

    The percentage of low performers in all subjects (mathematics, reading and science) is one of the highest among PISA-participating countries and economies. (62.9 %, rank 9/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The percentage of low performers in at least one subject (among mathematics, reading and science) is one of the highest among PISA-participating countries and economies. (89.5 %, rank 6/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    Student performance in mathematics

    The mean score in mathematics performance is one of the lowest among PISA-participating countries and economies. (361 PISA Score, rank 72/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    Boys' performance in mathematics is one of the lowest among PISA-participating countries and economies. (353 PISA Score, rank 74/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    Boys outperform girls in mathematics performance with one of the largest score-point difference. (-15 PISA Score, rank 54/56 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The score difference in mathematics between the 10% of students with the highest scores and the 10% of students with the lowest scores is one of the smallest among PISA-participating countries and economies. (158 PISA Score, rank 77/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The percentage of low performers in mathematics (below proficiency Level 2) is one of the highest among PISA-participating countries and economies. (82.8 %, rank 9/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The percentage of top performers in mathematics (proficiency Level 5 or 6) is one of the lowest among PISA-participating countries and economies. (0 %, rank 71/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The percentage of low-performing boys in mathematics (below proficiency Level 2) is one of the highest among PISA-participating countries and economies. (85.5 %, rank 5/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The percentage of top-performing boys in mathematics (proficiency Level 5 or 6) is one of the lowest among PISA-participating countries and economies. (0 %, rank 74/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The change in maths performance between 2015 and 2018 shows one of the strongest decreases among PISA-participating countries and economies. (-39 PISA Score, rank 47/48 , 2022) Download Indicator

    Student performance in reading

    The mean score in reading performance is one of the lowest among PISA-participating countries and economies. (342 PISA Score, rank 76/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    Boys' performance in reading is one of the lowest among PISA-participating countries and economies. (318 PISA Score, rank 79/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    Girls' performance in reading is one of the lowest among PISA-participating countries and economies. (364 PISA Score, rank 75/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The difference between girls and boys in reading performance is one of the smallest among PISA-participating countries and economies in favour of girls. (-46 PISA Score, rank 77/78 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The score difference in reading between the 10% of students with the highest scores and the 10% of students with the lowest scores is one of the smallest among PISA-participating countries and economies. (198 PISA Score, rank 71/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The percentage of low performers in reading (below proficiency Level 2) is one of the highest among PISA-participating countries and economies. (79.6 %, rank 5/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The percentage of top performers in reading (proficiency Level 5 or 6) is one of the lowest among PISA-participating countries and economies. (0 %, rank 72/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The percentage of low-performing boys in reading (below proficiency Level 2) is one of the highest among PISA-participating countries and economies. (87.8 %, rank 3/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The percentage of low-performing girls in reading (below proficiency Level 2) is one of the highest among PISA-participating countries and economies. (71.9 %, rank 5/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The percentage of top-performing girls in reading (proficiency Level 5 or 6) is one of the lowest among PISA-participating countries and economies. (0 %, rank 71/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    Student performance in science

    Boys' performance in science is one of the lowest among PISA-participating countries and economies. (358 PISA Score, rank 74/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The difference between girls and boys in science performance is one of the largest among PISA-participating countries and economies in favour of boys. (-33 PISA Score, rank 47/47 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The percentage of top performers in science (proficiency Level 5 or 6) is one of the lowest among PISA-participating countries and economies. (0 %, rank 71/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The percentage of low-performing boys in science (below proficiency Level 2) is one of the highest among PISA-participating countries and economies. (77.2 %, rank 7/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The percentage of top-performing boys in science (proficiency Level 5 or 6) is one of the lowest among PISA-participating countries and economies. (0 %, rank 71/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    Participation in education

    The difference in grade repetition between advantaged students and disadvantaged students is one of the smallest among 15-year-old students. (-0.2 %, rank 7/76 , 2022) Download Indicator

    Jordan registered one of the largest changes between 2018 and 2022 in the percentage of students who had repeated a grade at least once in primary, lower secondary or upper secondary school. (1.9 %, rank 5/39 , 2022) Download Indicator

    School climate

    Compared to other OECD and partner countries/economies, Jordan seems t have a higher level of school safety risks. (0.33 PISA Index, rank 8/69 , 2022) Download Indicator

    In Jordan has one of the widest difference between advantaged and disadvantaged students who reported that in the two weeks prior to the PISA test they had skipped at least one class or day of school, compared to the other OECD and partner countries/economies. (4.6 % points, rank 7/61 , 2022) Download Indicator

    Classroom environment

    Jordan has one of the largest share of students in schools that group students by abillity for all subjects. (47.2 %, rank 2/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    Jordan has one of the smallest share of students in schools that group students by abillity for some subjects. (16.9 %, rank 72/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    Student well-being

    In Jordan, the percentage of students who did not eat because there was not enough money to buy food is particularly large compared to the other OECD or partner countries/economies. (26.6 %, rank 9/66 , 2022) Download Indicator

    Students' engagement, drive and self-beliefs

    The time spent on homework per day in a typical school week in Jordan is long compared to the other OECD and partner countries/economies. (2 Hours, rank 6/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    Jordan has one of the smallest differences in mathematics performance associated with a one-hour increase in the time spent doing homework in all subjects, before accounting for students' and schools' socio-economic profile. (2 PISA Score points, rank 63/68 , 2022) Download Indicator

    Sense of belonging at school

    Jordan saw one of the strongest decreases on the index of sense of belonging between PISA 2012 and PISA 2022 (-0.36 PISA Index, rank 42/43 , 2022) Download Indicator

    Jordan saw one of the strongest decreases on the index of sense of belonging between PISA 2015 and PISA 2022 (-0.4 PISA Index, rank 43/45 , 2022) Download Indicator

    Bullying

    The difference in mathematics performance associated with a one-unit increase in the index of exposure to bullying is relatively small in Jordan, after accounting for students' and schools' socio-economic profile. (-12 PISA Score points, rank 65/70 , 2022) Download Indicator

    Performance and socio-economic status

    The variance of results in mathematics is weakly associated with the socio-economic status of students, as measured by the PISA index of economic, social and cultural status (ESCS). (5.2 %, rank 72/79 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The difference in mathematics performance associated with a one-unit increase in the PISA index of economic, social and cultural status (ESCS) is one of the smallest among PISA-participating countries and economies. (13 PISA Score, rank 75/79 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The maths performance of students in the ninth international decile of economic, social and cultural status (ESCS) scale is among the lowest, compared to countries and economies participating in PISA. (392 PISA Score, rank 74/79 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The maths performance of students in the top international decile of economic, social and cultural status (ESCS) scale is among the lowest, compared to countries and economies participating in PISA. (394 PISA Score, rank 77/79 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The percentage of low performers in maths among disadvantaged students in Jordan is among the highest compared to countries and economies participating in PISA. (91.3 %, rank 8/79 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The percentage of low performers in maths among advantaged students in Jordan is among the highest compared to countries and economies participating in PISA. (69.1 %, rank 8/79 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The percentage of top performers in maths among advantaged students in Jordan is among the lowest compared to countries and economies participating in PISA. (0 %, rank 76/79 , 2022) Download Indicator

    In Jordan, the variation between schools of the mathematics performance is among the smallest, when compared to average total variation across OECD countries. (11.7 %, rank 71/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    In Jordan, the variation within schools of the mathematics performance is among the smallest, when compared to average total variation across OECD countries. (35.4 %, rank 73/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    Jordan has one of the lowest differences in mathematics performance between students in the top quarter and students in the bottom quarter of the economic, social and cultural status index (ESCS). (40 PISA Score, rank 74/79 , 2022) Download Indicator

    Jordan has one of the largest differences in mathematics score associated with repeating a grade among OECD and partner countries/economies, before accounting for students' and schools' socio-economic profile. (-50 PISA Score points, rank 9/76 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The difference in science performance associated with a one-unit increase in the PISA index of economic, social and cultural status (ESCS) is one of the smallest among PISA-participating countries and economies. (15 PISA Score, rank 73/79 , 2022) Download Indicator

    Performance and diversity

    After accounting for socio-economic status, the difference in mathematics performance between non-immigrant and immigrant students is one of the largest among PISA-participating countries and economies, in favour of non-immigrants. (14 PISA Score, rank 9/30 , 2022) Download Indicator

    In Jordan, the share of immigrant students aged 15 who do not speak the language of the PISA assessment at home is relatively low. (6.3 %, rank 71/76 , 2022) Download Indicator

    In Jordan, the proportion of second generation immigrant students aged 15 who do not speak the language of the PISA assessment at home is relatively small. (6.9 %, rank 56/60 , 2022) Download Indicator

    Resources for education

    A small share of students attend schools with available room(s) where students can do their homework. (14.8 %, rank 79/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The change between 2012 and 2022 in the number of computers per student at schoolin Jordan is small compared to the other OECD and partner countries. (-0.08 Ratio, rank 35/40 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The change between 2015 and 2022 in the number of computers per student at schoolin Jordan is small compared to the other OECD and partner countries. (-0.17 Ratio, rank 26/31 , 2022) Download Indicator

    The share of students in schools whose principal reported that the use of cell phones is not allowed on the school premises is relatively high in Jordan. (79.2 %, rank 6/80 , 2022) Download Indicator

    In Jordan, digital device policies are enforced at the school to a greater extent compared to the other OECD and partner countries/economies. (0.43 PISA Index, rank 5/45 , 2022) Download Indicator

    In Jordan, the students were relatively more agree with various statements about regulation of ICT use at school than in other the OECD and partner countries/economies. (0.58 PISA Index, rank 4/52 , 2022) Download Indicator

    Teachers

    After accounting for students' and schools' socio-economic profile, Jordan has one of the smallest differences in mathematics performance per 10 percentage-points increase in the share of teachers fully certified by the appropriate authority. (-1 PISA Score points, rank 13/18 , 2022) Download Indicator

    Governance

    The percentage of students attending government-independent private schools is one of the highest among PISA-participating countries and economies. (19.5 %, rank 7/78 , 2022) Download Indicator

    In Jordan, compared to attending a public school, the difference in mathematics performance associated with attendance at private schools is among the largest of the OECD and partner countries/economies, after accounting for students' and schools' socio-economic profile. (29 PISA Score points, rank 6/39 , 2022) Download Indicator

    In Jordan, the educational leadership is particularly developed compared to the other OECD and partner countries/economies. (0.8 PISA Index, rank 7/75 , 2022) Download Indicator

    COVID-19 effects on education

    Jordan ranked among the countries where students reported a relatively low feeling of confidence in their capacity for self-directed learning, compared to the other OECD and partner countries/economies. (-0.2 PISA Index, rank 67/76 , 2022) Download Indicator

    In Jordan, mathematics performance has one of the weakest increases assotiated to a one-unit increase in the index of confidence in capacity for self-directed learning (before accounting for students' and schools' socio-economic profile) (4 PISA Score points, rank 72/73 , 2022) Download Indicator

    In Jordan, mathematics performance has one of the weakest increases assotiated to a one-unit increase in the index of confidence in capacity for self-directed learning (after accounting for students' and schools' socio-economic profile) (2 PISA Score points, rank 69/69 , 2022) Download Indicator


    The data table will display up to six selected countries.
    General findings
    
    
    • Singapore scored significantly higher than all other countries/economies in mathematics (575 points) and, along with Hong Kong (China), Japan, Korea, Macao (China), and Chinese Taipei, outperformed all other countries and economies in mathematics. Another 17 countries also performed above the OECD average (472 points), ranging from Estonia (510 points) to New Zealand (479 points).
    • Boys outperformed girls in mathematics by nine score points and girls outperformed boys in reading by 24 score points on average across OECD countries. In science, the performance difference between boys and girls is not significant.
    • An average of 69% of students are at least basically proficient in mathematics in OECD countries. This means they are beginning to demonstrate the ability and initiative to use mathematics in simple real-life situations.
    • In 16 out of 81 countries/economies participating in PISA 2022, more than 10% of students attained Level 5 or 6 proficiency, meaning they are high-performing: they understand that a problem is quantitative in nature and can formulate complex mathematical models to solve it. By contrast, less than 5% of students are high-performing in 42 countries/economies.
    Visualisations
    Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
    Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
    Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
    
    
    • Singapore scored significantly higher than all other countries/economies in reading (543 points) and science (561 points). Behind Singapore, Ireland performed as well as Estonia, Japan, Korea and Chinese Taipei while another 14 education systems performed above the OECD average in reading (476 points), ranging from Macao (China) (510 points) to Italy (482 points).
    • About three out of four students have achieved basic proficiency in reading in OECD countries.
    • In reading, an OECD average of 7% of students attained the highest proficiency levels of 5 or 6. In 13 countries/economies, more than 10% of students are top performers in reading.
    • No change in the OECD average over consecutive PISA assessments up to 2018 has ever exceeded five points in reading: in PISA 2022, however, the OECD average dropped by about 10 score points in reading compared to PISA 2018.. The unprecedented drops reading point to the shock effect of COVID-19 on most countries.
    • Only four countries and economies improved their performance between PISA 2018 and 2022 in all three subjects: Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, the Dominican Republic and Chinese Taipei.
    • Trend analysis of PISA results reveals a decades-long decline that began well before the pandemic. In reading, performances peaked in 2012 and 2009, respectively, before dipping while performance began a downward descent in mathematics before 2018 in Australia, Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, Finland, Hungary, Iceland, Korea, the Netherlands, New Zealand, the Slovak Republic and Switzerland.
    Visualisations
    Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
    Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
    Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
    
    
    • Mean performance in science remained stable.
    • In science, the highest-performing education systems are Singapore, Japan, Macao (China), Chinese Taipei, Korea, Estonia, Hong Kong (China) and Canada. Finland performed as well as Canada in science. In addition to these nine countries and economies, another 15 education systems also performed above the OECD average in science (485 points), ranging from Australia (507 points) to Belgium (491 points).
    • About three out of four students have achieved basic proficiency science in OECD countries.
    • In science, an OECD average of 7% of students attained the highest proficiency levels of 5 or 6. In 14 countries/economies, more than 10% of students are top performers in science.
    • Only four countries and economies improved their performance between PISA 2018 and 2022 in all three subjects: Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, the Dominican Republic and Chinese Taipei.
    • Trend analysis of PISA results reveals a decades-long decline that began well before the pandemic. In science, performances peaked in 2012 and 2009, respectively, before dipping. while performance began a downward descent in mathematics before 2018 in Australia, Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, Finland, Hungary, Iceland, Korea, the Netherlands, New Zealand, the Slovak Republic and Switzerland.
    Visualisations
    Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
    Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
    Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
    
    
    • Socio-economically advantaged students scored 93 points more in mathematics than disadvantaged students on average across OECD countries. The performance gap attributed to students' socio-economic status is greater than 93 score points in 22 countries or economies and 50 points or fewer in 13 countries or economies.
    • Boys outperformed girls in mathematics by nine score points and girls outperformed boys in reading by 24 score points on average across OECD countries. In science, the performance difference between boys and girls is not significant.
    • Non-immigrant students scored 29 points more than immigrant students in mathematics on average across OECD countries but non-immigrant students scored only five points more than immigrant students once socio-economic status and language spoken at home had been accounted for.
    Visualisations
    Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
    Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
    Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
    
    
    • Between 2018 and 2022 trends in students' sense of belonging at school were mixed, with equal proportions of countries/economies showing stable, improving or deteriorating trends. Of the 47 education systems with improving or stable trends, only 20 maintained or attained a level of students' sense of belonging at school that was at or above the OECD average. 
    • Around 10% of students reported feeling unsafe on their way to or from school, or in places outside of the classroom, on average across OECD countries. Some 20% of students reported that they are bullied at least a few times a month.
    • Overall, students felt more confident about using digital technology for learning remotely during future school closures than they felt about taking responsibility for their own learning. For instance, on average across OECD countries, about three out of four students reported that they feel confident or very confident about using a learning-management system, a school learning platform or a video communication program, as well as about finding learning resources online on their own.
    • Students' experience with learning at home was more positive in systems that were better prepared for remote learning. However, when learning remotely, 40% of all students reported feeling lonely and 50% of all students reported feeling anxious about schoolwork and that they fell behind in their studies; and three in ten students reported that teachers were not available when needed, on average across OECD countries. 
    Visualisations
    Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
    Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
    Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
    Key
    Diagram of funding flows - Jordan

    Click on the coverpage to see the full OECD iLibrary version
    Key
    Country Reviews for Jordan

    Note: These values should be interpreted with care since they are influenced by countries' specific contexts and trade-offs. In education, there is often no simple most- or least-efficient model. For instance, the share of private expenditure in education must be read against other measures designed to mitigate inequities, such as loans and grants; longer learning time is an opportunity to convey more and better content to students, but may hinder investments in other important areas. If you want further information on the nature of different variables, please take the time to read the analysis and contextual information, available at the website for each publication.
    All rankings for individual variables are compiled on the basis of OECD and G20 countries for which data are available. The OECD average includes only OECD countries which are listed here: http://www.oecd.org/about/membersandpartners/

    Reference years displayed in the Education GPS correspond to the most common year of reference among countries for which data is available on each variable. Data for the latest available year is preferred and some countries may have provided data refering to a more recent or late year. To know more about possible exceptions on data please click on the "Download Indicator" link on each variable. When a year of reference corresponds to a school year encompassing two years, the reference reads as follows: 2018 for school year 2017/2018.

    *TALIS averages are based on all countries participating in the TALIS survey, including partner countries and economies. This explains the difference between the OECD average and the TALIS averages. Data from the TALIS survey and Education at a Glance (EAG) may differ. See Annex E of the TALIS technical report and Annex 3 of EAG 2021 for more details about the data collections.

    B-S-J-Z (China) refers to the four PISA-participating provinces/municipalities of the People's Republic of China: Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu and Zhejiang.

    For additional notes, please refer to annexes in the list of links below the introductory country profile text.