Explore the OECD's reports or draw from a wide variety of education indicators and data to construct your own, customised country reports, highlighting the facts, developments and outcomes of your choice.

Country

Data profiles:



Greece
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015)
  • In Greece, the mean proficiency score of 16-65 year-olds in literacy is significantly below the average of the OECD countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). In numeracy, the mean proficiency score is significantly below the average.
  • The young Greek population (25-34 year-olds) scores at 255 in literacy, compared to 277 on average in the OECD countries participating in the Survey. In numeracy, they score at 256 (272 in average). In numeracy, younger adults score higher than their older counterparts (55-65 year-olds). In numeracy, the difference between the mean scores of younger adults and their older counterparts (55-65 year-olds) is not significant.
  • In Greece, 20.2% of the adult population (16-65 year-olds) report no prior experience with computers or lack very basic computer skills. In contrast, 14% of the adult population score at the highest levels in problem solving in technology-rich environments.
  • About one quarter of the adults scores at the lowest levels in literacy and 28.5% score low in numeracy.
  • Greece is one of the few countries where women outperform men in literacy.
  • Tertiary-educated adults in Greece have relatively low proficiency in literacy, numeracy and problem solving in technology-rich environments.
  • Profile View

    Select first some countries to compare, choose the charts you wish to display and customise them.

    The following list displays indicators for which your selected country shows the highest and lowest values among countries. The list can be sorted by level of education or by age group. All rankings are calculated including available data from OECD and partner countries. Find out more about the methodology here.

    Show indicators for which your country ranks among the top or bottom: Sort by:

    Problem solving in technology-rich environments

    The percentage of adults with missing values in the assessment of problem solving in technology-rich environments is high compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (6.7 %, rank 1/33 , 2018) Download Indicator

    The percentage of adults who failed the ICT core is low compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (2.8 %, rank 30/36 , 2018) Download Indicator

    The percentage of adults who had no computer experience is high compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (17.4 %, rank 8/36 , 2018) Download Indicator

    The percentage of adults scoring below Level 1 in problem solving in technology-rich environments is high compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (22.4 %, rank 5/33 , 2018) Download Indicator

    The percentage of adults scoring at Level 1 in problem solving in technology-rich environments is low compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (25.5 %, rank 25/33 , 2018) Download Indicator

    The percentage of adults scoring at Level 2 in problem solving in technology-rich environments is low compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (11.5 %, rank 29/33 , 2018) Download Indicator

    The percentage of adults scoring at Level 3 in problem solving in technology-rich environments is low compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (2.5 %, rank 26/33 , 2018) Download Indicator

    Skills differences between age groups

    The percentage of young adults (25-34 year-olds) scoring high (at Level 2 or 3) in problem solving in technology-rich environments is low compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (20.5 %, rank 28/33 , 2018) Download Indicator

    The percentage of older adults (55-65 year-olds) scoring high (at Level 2 or 3) in problem solving in technology-rich environments is low compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (4.8 %, rank 23/32 , 2018) Download Indicator

    Skills differences by gender

    The percentage of men scoring high (at Level 2 or 3) in problem solving in technology-rich environments is low compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (14.8 %, rank 29/33 , 2018) Download Indicator

    The percentage of women scoring at Level 2 or 3 in problem solving in technology-rich environments is low compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (13.2 %, rank 28/33 , 2018) Download Indicator

    Skills differences by level of education

    The percentage of adults without upper secondary education scoring high (at Level 2 or 3) in problem solving in technology-rich environments is low compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (1.3 %, rank 26/32 , 2018) Download Indicator

    The percentage of adults with an upper secondary education scoring high (at Level 2 or 3) in problem solving in technology-rich environments is low compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (10.6 %, rank 27/33 , 2018) Download Indicator

    The percentage of adults with tertiary education scoring high (at Level 2 or 3) in problem solving in technology-rich environments is low compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (28.2 %, rank 28/33 , 2018) Download Indicator

    Skills by parents' educational attainment

    The percentage of adults with at least one parent with upper secondary education scoring high (at Level 2 or 3) in problem solving in technology-rich environments is low compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (19.6 %, rank 28/33 , 2018) Download Indicator

    The percentage of adults with at least one parent with tertiary education scoring high (at Level 2 or 3) in problem solving in technology-rich environments is low compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (31.8 %, rank 29/33 , 2018) Download Indicator


    The data table will display up to six selected countries.
    General findings
    
                            
      In the 2023 Survey of Adult Skills, literacy is defined as "accessing, understanding, evaluating, and reflecting on written texts in order to achieve one's goals, to develop one's knowledge and potential, and to participate in society" (Rouet et al., 2021). Proficiency in literacy is crucial for adults across their personal, social and professional spheres, given the prevalence of written communication in various aspects of life. Throughout the day, adults engage in a diverse range of reading activities, spanning from delving into extensive pieces of continuous text to swiftly scanning pages for pertinent information. Examples include reading emails, leaflets, timetables and instruction manuals.
    Visualisations
    Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
    Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
    Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
    
                            
      In the 2023 Survey of Adult Skills, numeracy encompasses "accessing, using, and reasoning critically with mathematical content, information and ideas represented in multiple ways in order to engage in and manage the mathematical demands of a range of situations in adult life" (Tout et al., 2021). The skills and knowledge needed for work and civic participation, and in more personal spheres of life, have changed. Individuals are presented with ever-increasing amounts of information of a quantitative or mathematical nature through online or technology-based resources, which have to be located, selected or filtered, interpreted, and at times questioned and doubted, and analysed for their relevance to the responses needed.
    Visualisations
    Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
    Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
    Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
    
                            
      The first cycle of the Survey of Adult Skills measured problem solving in technology-rich environments. This is defined as the ability to use digital technology, communication tools and networks to acquire and evaluate information, communicate with others and perform practical tasks. The survey assessed adults' ability to solve problems by establishing appropriate goals and plans, and accessing and using information through computers and computer networks.

      In the 2023 Survey of Adult Skills, problem solving in technology-rich environments was replaced by adaptive problem solving (APS). This involves "the capacity to achieve one’s goals in a dynamic situation in which a method for solution is not immediately available. It requires engaging in cognitive and metacognitive processes to define the problem, search for information, and apply a solution in a variety of information environments and contexts" (Greiff et al., 2021).

      APS has three important features. First, it emphasises individuals’ capacity to flexibly and dynamically adapt their problem-solving strategies to a dynamically changing environment. Second, it tests their ability to identify and select among a range of available physical, social and digital resources. Third, individuals need to monitor and reflect on their progress in solving problems, through metacognitive processes.
    Visualisations
    Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
    Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
    Click the arrow sign next to the title: arrows to display other variables
    Key
    Diagram of funding flows - Greece

    Click on the coverpage to see the full OECD iLibrary version
    Key
    Country Reviews for Greece

    Note: These values should be interpreted with care since they are influenced by countries' specific contexts and trade-offs. In education, there is often no simple most- or least-efficient model. For instance, the share of private expenditure in education must be read against other measures designed to mitigate inequities, such as loans and grants; longer learning time is an opportunity to convey more and better content to students, but may hinder investments in other important areas. If you want further information on the nature of different variables, please take the time to read the analysis and contextual information, available at the website for each publication.
    All rankings for individual variables are compiled on the basis of OECD and G20 countries for which data are available. The OECD average includes only OECD countries which are listed here: http://www.oecd.org/about/membersandpartners/

    Reference years displayed in the Education GPS correspond to the most common year of reference among countries for which data is available on each variable. Data for the latest available year is preferred and some countries may have provided data refering to a more recent or late year. To know more about possible exceptions on data please click on the "Download Indicator" link on each variable. When a year of reference corresponds to a school year encompassing two years, the reference reads as follows: 2018 for school year 2017/2018.

    *TALIS averages are based on all countries participating in the TALIS survey, including partner countries and economies. This explains the difference between the OECD average and the TALIS averages. Data from the TALIS survey and Education at a Glance (EAG) may differ. See Annex E of the TALIS technical report and Annex 3 of EAG 2021 for more details about the data collections.

    B-S-J-Z (China) refers to the four PISA-participating provinces/municipalities of the People's Republic of China: Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu and Zhejiang.

    For additional notes, please refer to annexes in the list of links below the introductory country profile text.