Country
Data profiles:
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, primary education (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, lower and upper secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
ECEC staff, leaders and their working conditions (Starting Strong Survey 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, primary to upper secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, primary and lower secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
ECEC staff, leaders and their working conditions (Starting Strong Survey 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
ECEC staff, leaders and their working conditions (Starting Strong Survey 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
ECEC staff, leaders and their working conditions (Starting Strong Survey 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, primary and lower secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
ECEC staff, leaders and their working conditions (Starting Strong Survey 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, primary and lower secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
ECEC staff, leaders and their working conditions (Starting Strong Survey 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
ECEC staff, leaders and their working conditions (Starting Strong Survey 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, lower and upper secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, lower and upper secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, primary and lower secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, primary to upper secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, primary to upper secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
ECEC staff, leaders and their working conditions (Starting Strong Survey 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, primary and lower secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2017) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, primary and lower secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, lower and upper secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, primary to upper secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, lower and upper secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, primary to upper secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance in 18 out of 27 regions (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, primary to upper secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Profile View
Select first some countries to compare, choose the charts you wish to display and customise them.
School climate
In Brazil, a small number of teachers 'agree' or 'strongly agree' that teachers and students usually get on well with each other. (93.5 %, rank 46/50 , 2018) Download Indicator
Who the teachers are
Brazil shows one of the strongest increases in the share of teachers aged 50 and above between 2013 and 2018, compared to other countries participating in the TALIS survey. (7.4 % points, rank 3/32 , 2018) Download Indicator
In upper secondary education, the total number of years working in other non-educational roles in Brazil is one of the longest among all OECD and partner countries with available data. (6.4 Years, rank 2/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
In Brazil, the difference in the share of female teachers is one of the largest in upper secondary compared to lower secondary education. (-10.7 % points, rank 10/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
The proportion of male teachers in upper secondary level who teaches STEM is one of the highest in Brazil among all OECD and partner countries with available data. (38.2 %, rank 2/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
In Brazil, the share of female teachers who teaches VET at upper secondary level is relatively low. (5.9 %, rank 12/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
The percentage of male teachers who teaches VET at upper secondary level is relatively low in Brazil. (10 %, rank 11/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
Who the principals are
Compared to other TALIS countries, a larger proportion of principals in Brazil are female. (76.5 %, rank 2/49 , 2018) Download Indicator
Principals in Brazil are on average younger than principals in most other TALIS countries. (46.5 Years, rank 46/49 , 2018) Download Indicator
The percentage of female principals in upper secondary education is one of the highest in Brazil among all OECD and partner countries with available data. (68.2 %, rank 1/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
Initial and induction training of teachers
The percentage of upper secondary teachers who were instructed on subject content, pedagogy and classroom practice is especially high in Brazil. (81.5 %, rank 4/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
The share of upper secondary teachers who participated in some kind of induction at their current school is one of the lowest in Brazil among all OECD and partner countries with available data. (41.2 %, rank 10/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
A small share of upper secondary teachers teach reading with training in the subject in Brazil. (76.7 %, rank 9/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
The percentage of upper secondary teachers teaching mathematics with training in the subject is especially low in Brazil. (72.3 %, rank 10/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
In upper secondary education, the percentage of teachers teaching science with training in the subject is especially low in Brazil. (72.2 %, rank 10/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
A small share of upper secondary teachers teach social sciences with training in the subject in Brazil. (73 %, rank 10/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
Professional development of teachers
Relative to most TALIS countries, a smaller proportion of teachers report having undertaken professional development in the 12 months prior to the survey. (87.1 %, rank 47/50 , 2018) Download Indicator
In Brazil, the percentage of upper secondary teachers who attended at least one professional development activity in the last year is especially low. (87 %, rank 12/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
The share of principals in upper secondary education who attended at least one professional development activity in the last year is especially small in Brazil. (98.1 %, rank 10/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
Professional development of principals
Among TALIS countries, Brazil has a lower proportion of principals who participated in at least one professional development activity in the 12 months prior to the survey. (94.5 %, rank 48/49 , 2018) Download Indicator
Teachers' practices
In Brazil, class-time spent on administrative tasks (such as marking attendance) is longer. (11.3 %, rank 4/50 , 2018) Download Indicator
Compared to other TALIS countries, class-time spent on classroom management is longer. (18.8 %, rank 3/50 , 2018) Download Indicator
Class-time spent on actual teaching and learning tasks is shorter in Brazil. (67.4 %, rank 48/50 , 2018) Download Indicator
A large proportion of teachers report to 'frequently' or 'always' give tasks that require students to think critically. (84.2 %, rank 2/50 , 2018) Download Indicator
A large proportion of teachers report to 'frequently' or 'always' tell students to follow classroom rules. (90.4 %, rank 4/50 , 2018) Download Indicator
A large proportion of teachers report to 'frequently' or 'always' tell students to listen to what they say. (91.1 %, rank 3/50 , 2018) Download Indicator
A large proportion of teachers report to 'frequently' or 'always' calm students who are disruptive. (87 %, rank 1/50 , 2018) Download Indicator
A large proportion of teachers report to 'frequently' or 'always' refer to a problem from everyday life or work to demonstrate why new knowledge is useful. (91.3 %, rank 4/50 , 2018) Download Indicator
A large proportion of teachers report to 'frequently' or 'always' administer their own assessment. (94.1 %, rank 4/50 , 2018) Download Indicator
Principals' practices
Principals report spending shorter time on administrative and leadership tasks and meetings. (38.5 %, rank 32/32 , 2018) Download Indicator
Principals report spending shorter time on administrative tasks and meetings. (20.9 %, rank 46/49 , 2018) Download Indicator
Teachers' autonomy, collegiality and collaboration
In Brazil, the percentage of upper secondary teachers who report engaging in discussion about the learning development of specific students at least once a month is relatively small. (38.8 %, rank 9/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
ICT for teaching
Compared to other TALIS countries, a larger proportion of school leaders report a shortage or inadequacy of digital technology for instruction. (59 %, rank 5/49 , 2018) Download Indicator
A small share of upper secondary teachers report that they frequently or always let students use ICT for projects or class work in Brazil. (50.6 %, rank 10/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
In Brazil, the percentage of upper secondary teachers who report a high need for professional development in using ICT for teaching is relatively . (26.8 %, rank 2/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
A large proportion of upper secondary principals report that the delivery of quality instruction is hindered by a shortage of teachers with competencies in teaching students with special needs in Brazil. (58 %, rank 2/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
Teaching students with special needs
A larger proportion of teachers report a high level of need to develop their skills to teach students with special needs. (58.4 %, rank 1/50 , 2018) Download Indicator
More school leaders in Brazil report a shortage of teachers with competence in teaching students with special needs. (59.6 %, rank 4/49 , 2018) Download Indicator
Teaching in multicultural settings
More teachers report a high level of need for professional development in student behaviour and classroom management. (44 %, rank 3/49 , 2018) Download Indicator
Teaching in vocational education and training
In Brazil, the percentage of upper secondary teachers in VET schools who reported that their initial training included all the areas of content, pedagogy and classroom practice is especially high . (78.4 %, rank 3/11 , 2018) Download Indicator
In Brazil, the percentage of upper secondary teachers in non-VET schools who reported that their initial training included all the areas of content, pedagogy and classroom practice is especially high . (82.2 %, rank 3/11 , 2018) Download Indicator
The percentage of VET teachers in upper secondary education who report that they frequently or always ask students to decide on their own procedures for solving complex tasks is relatively low in Brazil. (45.4 %, rank 10/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
The proportion of non-VET teachers in upper secondary education who report that they frequently or always ask students to decide on their own procedures for solving complex tasks is relatively small in Brazil. (41.2 %, rank 9/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
Classroom management
A higher proportion of teachers "agree" or "strongly agree" loosing quite a lot of time due to students interrupting the lesson. (50.1 %, rank 1/50 , 2018) Download Indicator
Teachers' self-efficacy
A larger proportion of teachers believe that they can help their students to think critically. (95.6 %, rank 3/49 , 2018) Download Indicator
Teachers' satisfaction with their jobs
In Brazil, there is a small share of upper secondary teachers who think that the teaching profession is valued by society. (11.1 %, rank 10/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
The percentage of upper secondary teachers who report being satisfied with their job is especially low in Brazil. (85.4 %, rank 12/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
The share of upper secondary teachers who report that they are satisfied with their salary is one of the smallest in Brazil among all OECD and partner countries with available data. (17.2 %, rank 11/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
In Brazil, the share of upper secondary teachers who report being satisfied with the terms of their teaching contract apart from salary is relatively small. (47.2 %, rank 11/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
In Brazil, the proportion of teachers who report being satisfied with the terms of their teaching contract, apart from salary is higher in upper secondary compared to lower secondary level. (-5.4 % points, rank 5/5 , 2018) Download Indicator
In upper secondary education, the share of teachers reporting there is a collaborative culture characterised by mutual support is smaller in Brazil compared to other OECD and partner countries with available data. (74.2 %, rank 9/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
Teachers’ working conditions, mobility and risk of attrition
In Brazil, the proportion of teachers who have a permanent contract in upper secondary education is one of the smallest among all OECD and partner countries with available data. (77.9 %, rank 9/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
In Brazil, there is a small share of full-time teachers in upper secondary level. (46 %, rank 12/12 , 2018) Download Indicator
General findings
- Across OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS, teachers are 44 years old and principals are 52 years old, on average. Furthermore, 20% of principals across the OECD are aged 60 and above.
- In the OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS, 47% of principals are women, compared to 68% of teachers.
Visualisations
- In OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS, 65% of teachers report frequently calming students who are disruptive and 84% report frequently explaining how new and old topics are related.
- During a typical lesson, teachers spend 78% of classroom time on actual teaching and learning, on average in the OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS.
- In the past five to ten years, classroom time spent on actual teaching and learning has decreased in about half of the countries and economies participating in TALIS.
- 84% of teachers report having control over determining course content in their class, on average across in OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS.
- 81% of teachers say that they work in a collaborative school culture characterised by mutual support, on average in OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS. Furthermore, 59% of principals took actions on a regular basis to support co-operation among teachers to develop new teaching practices in the 12 months prior to the survey.
- On average in OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS, only 21% of teachers report participating in collaborative professional learning at least once a month and 28% engage in team-teaching with the same frequency.
- About half of teachers in the OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS "frequently" or "always" let students use ICT for projects or class work, but 25% of school principals report that delivery of quality instruction in their school is hindered by a shortage or inadequacy of digital technology for instruction.
- In the OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS, 27% of teachers work in classes with at least 10% of students with special needs (i.e. those for whom a special learning need has been formally identified because they are mentally, physically, or emotionally disadvantaged). But, 32% of school principals report that delivery of quality instruction in their school is hindered by a shortage of teachers with competence in teaching students with special needs.
Visualisations
- During their initial education and training, 79% of teachers in the OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS were instructed on subject content, pedagogy and classroom. Only 42% of teachers report having participated in some kind of formal or informal induction when they joined their current school.
- In the OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS, taking part in some kind of in-service training is commonplace among teachers and principals, with 94% of teachers and 99% of principals attending at least one professional development activity in the year prior to the survey.
Visualisations
- Across OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS, 26% of teachers "agree" or "strongly agree" with the statement that their profession is valued in society. Between 2013 and 2018, the percentage of teachers reporting that the profession is valued in society has increased in almost half of the countries and economies with available data.
- Nine out of ten teachers and 95% of school leaders report that, all in all, they are satisfied with their job, on average in OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS.
- 39% of teachers and 47% of school leaders report being satisfied with their salaries, on average in OECD countries and economies.
Visualisations
- Across OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS, 82% of teachers have a permanent contract while 12% of teacher are employed on contracts of one year or less.
- 18% of teachers report experiencing stress in their work "a lot", on average in OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS. 49% of teachers report that having too much administrative work is a source of stress they experience at work "quite a bit" or "a lot".
- A quarter of teachers report that they would like to leave teaching within the next five years, on average across the OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS. Furthermore, 14% of teachers age 50 or would like to leave teaching in the next five years.
Visualisations
- Only 10% of teachers report that they have never received feedback in their schools. On average across the OECD, the forms of feedback most commonly used are based on classroom observations and students' school-based and classroom-based results.
- 71% of teachers who received feedback in the 12 months prior to the survey report that it had a positive impact on their teaching practice. In all countries and economies participating in TALIS, teachers who report receiving feedback based on multiple methods are more likely to find that the feedback they received had a positive impact on their teaching.
- The proportion of teachers who work in schools where appraisal can result in a salary increase or financial bonus is 55% in schools where school management has responsibility over salaries. In schools where school management does not have responsibility over salaries, the proportion is only 30%.
Visualisations
- The proportion of female teachers represents over three quarters of the primary teaching force (TALIS average 78%), which is higher than the proportion in lower secondary education of 63%.
- Less than half of teachers (46% on average) cited receiving formal training in facilitating transitions from early childhood education to primary education. However, a slightly smaller share of teachers (38%) said they felt well or very well prepared in this area.
- Thirty-seven percent (37%) of teachers report modifying lessons for students with special needs is a source of stress "quite a bit" or "a lot" in primary in contrast to 29% in lower secondary.
- Teachers in upper secondary education reported being involved in fewer collaborative activities than their peers in lower secondary education. Teaching jointly as a team in the same class shows significant decreases among teachers in upper secondary (5 percentage points difference).
- Almost a quarter of teachers (23%) in upper secondary education stated they would like to leave teaching in the next five years. Teachers satisfied with their salaries and terms of employment, and who consider the school provides opportunities to engage in discussion and has a collaborative culture are less likely to state they will leave teaching.
Visualisations
All rankings for individual variables are compiled on the basis of OECD and G20 countries for which data are available. The OECD average includes only OECD countries which are listed here: http://www.oecd.org/about/membersandpartners/
Reference years displayed in the Education GPS correspond to the most common year of reference among countries for which data is available on each variable. Data for the latest available year is preferred and some countries may have provided data refering to a more recent or late year. To know more about possible exceptions on data please click on the "Download Indicator" link on each variable. When a year of reference corresponds to a school year encompassing two years, the reference reads as follows: 2018 for school year 2017/2018.
*TALIS averages are based on all countries participating in the TALIS survey, including partner countries and economies. This explains the difference between the OECD average and the TALIS averages. Data from the TALIS survey and Education at a Glance (EAG) may differ. See Annex E of the TALIS technical report and Annex 3 of EAG 2021 for more details about the data collections.
B-S-J-Z (China) refers to the four PISA-participating provinces/municipalities of the People's Republic of China: Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu and Zhejiang.
For additional notes, please refer to annexes in the list of links below the introductory country profile text.