Country
Data profiles:
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, primary education (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, lower and upper secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
ECEC staff, leaders and their working conditions (Starting Strong Survey 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, primary to upper secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, primary and lower secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
ECEC staff, leaders and their working conditions (Starting Strong Survey 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
ECEC staff, leaders and their working conditions (Starting Strong Survey 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
ECEC staff, leaders and their working conditions (Starting Strong Survey 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, primary and lower secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
ECEC staff, leaders and their working conditions (Starting Strong Survey 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, primary and lower secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
ECEC staff, leaders and their working conditions (Starting Strong Survey 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
ECEC staff, leaders and their working conditions (Starting Strong Survey 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, lower and upper secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, lower and upper secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, primary and lower secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, primary to upper secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, primary to upper secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
ECEC staff, leaders and their working conditions (Starting Strong Survey 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, primary and lower secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, primary and lower secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, lower and upper secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, primary to upper secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, lower and upper secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2023) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2024) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, primary to upper secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance in 18 out of 27 regions (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Student performance (PISA 2022) |
Teachers and teaching conditions, primary to upper secondary education (TALIS 2018) |
Profile View

Select first some countries to compare, choose the charts you wish to display and customise them.
School climate
A small share of principals report that intimidation or bullying among students occurred at least weekly in their school. (0.4 %, rank 46/49 , 2018) Download Indicator
Who the teachers are
Korea shows one of the strongest increases in the share of teachers aged 50 and above between 2013 and 2018, compared to other countries participating in the TALIS survey. (6.3 % points, rank 4/32 , 2018) Download Indicator
The total working years as a teacher in Korea is comparatively short at primary level. (15 Years, rank 12/14 , 2018) Download Indicator
In primary education, the total number of years working in other non-educational roles in Korea is one of the shortest among all OECD and partner countries with available data. (0.4 Years, rank 13/14 , 2018) Download Indicator
In Korea, the teachers in primary education worked a similar number of years in other non-educational roles compared to those lower secondary level. (-0.2 Years, rank 2/8 , 2018) Download Indicator
In Korea, the share of female teachers is one of the smallest in primary compared to lower secondary education. (9.4 % points, rank 12/14 , 2018) Download Indicator
Who the principals are
Compared to other TALIS countries, a smaller proportion of principals in Korea are female. (19.6 %, rank 47/49 , 2018) Download Indicator
Principals in Korea are on average older than principals in most other TALIS countries. (58.7 Years, rank 1/49 , 2018) Download Indicator
On average, principals in Korea have spent less years in their role than principal in most other TALIS countries. (3.4 Years, rank 49/49 , 2018) Download Indicator
A larger proportion of principals are aged 60 and above relative to other TALIS countries. (43.7 %, rank 1/49 , 2018) Download Indicator
The proportion of female principals in primary education is one of the smallest in Korea. (44 %, rank 11/14 , 2018) Download Indicator
Initial and induction training of teachers
In Korea, more teachers had content, pedagogy and classroom practice in their initial formal education or training. (89.9 %, rank 5/50 , 2018) Download Indicator
A large share of teachers in primary education were instructed on subject content, pedagogy and classroom practice in Korea. (95.1 %, rank 2/14 , 2018) Download Indicator
The share of primary education teachers who participated in some kind of induction at their current school is one of the lowest in Korea among all OECD and partner countries with available data. (21.7 %, rank 12/14 , 2018) Download Indicator
The share of teachers in primary education who received formal training in facilitating transitions is one of the highest in Korea among all OECD and partner countries with available data. (54.8 %, rank 4/14 , 2018) Download Indicator
Principals' formal training
A lower proportion of principals reported that school administration or principal training programme or course elements were never included in their initial formal education or training. (1.5 %, rank 44/48 , 2018) Download Indicator
For a large share of principals, instructional leadership training or course were included in their formal education or training before taking up position as principal. (61.9 %, rank 2/47 , 2018) Download Indicator
Professional development of teachers
A large percentage of teachers participated in a network of teachers formed specifically for the professional development of teachers in the 12 months prior to the survey. (68.2 %, rank 4/50 , 2018) Download Indicator
The proportion of primary education teachers who attended at least one professional development activity in the last year is especially large in Korea. (99.2 %, rank 1/14 , 2018) Download Indicator
In Korea, a similar percentage of teachers attended at least one professional development activity in the last year in primary compared to lower secondary education. (1.4 % points, rank 6/8 , 2018) Download Indicator
The share of principals in primary education who attended at least one professional development activity in the last year is especially large in Korea. (100 %, rank 1/14 , 2018) Download Indicator
Professional development of principals
Relative to other TALIS countries, less principals in Korea never received any instructional leadership training . (2.3 %, rank 45/47 , 2018) Download Indicator
Teachers' practices
Teachers report spending less hours per week marking and correcting work. (2.9 Hours/week, rank 47/50 , 2018) Download Indicator
A small proportion of teachers report to 'frequently' or 'always' administer their own assessment. (52.9 %, rank 47/50 , 2018) Download Indicator
In Korea, a high percentage of teachers in primary education who report frequently or always explaining to their students what they expect them to learn. (96.6 %, rank 3/14 , 2018) Download Indicator
In Korea, a large proportion of teachers in primary education report that maintaining classroom discipline is a source of stress. (47.8 %, rank 3/14 , 2018) Download Indicator
The proportion of teachers in primary school reporting a high need for professional development in student behavior and classroom management is especially high in Korea. (33.3 %, rank 3/14 , 2018) Download Indicator
In Korea, the share of teachers reporting a high need for professional development in student behavior and classroom management is more important in primary compared to lower secondary education. (5.5 % points, rank 3/10 , 2018) Download Indicator
Principals' practices
Principals report spending shorter time on administrative and leadership tasks and meetings. (43.9 %, rank 28/32 , 2018) Download Indicator
Principals report spending longer time on curriculum and teaching-related tasks and meetings. (23.6 %, rank 2/32 , 2018) Download Indicator
Principals report spending shorter time on leadership tasks and meetings. (15.8 %, rank 48/49 , 2018) Download Indicator
Teachers' autonomy, collegiality and collaboration
Korea has one of the highest proportion of teachers who agree that they have control over determining course content. (96.2 %, rank 4/50 , 2018) Download Indicator
ICT for teaching
A large share of primary education teachers received formal training in using ICT for teaching in Korea. (83.5 %, rank 3/14 , 2018) Download Indicator
A large share of primary education teachers feel well prepared in using ICT for teaching in Korea. (61.2 %, rank 4/14 , 2018) Download Indicator
The proportion of teachers in primary education who report that they frequently or always let students use ICT for projects or class work is one of the lowest in Korea among all OECD and partner economies with available data. (28.3 %, rank 10/14 , 2018) Download Indicator
Teaching students with special needs
A lower proportion of teachers in Korea teach in classes with more than 10% of special needs students compared to other TALIS countries. (5.9 %, rank 46/50 , 2018) Download Indicator
"Teaching in a mixed-ability setting" was included in a lower proportion of teachers' professional development activities. (24.5 %, rank 48/50 , 2018) Download Indicator
In Korea, the proportion of primary education teachers reporting a high need for professional development in teaching special needs students is especially small. (15.5 %, rank 13/14 , 2018) Download Indicator
A small proportion of primary education principals report that the delivery of quality instruction is hindered by a shortage of teachers with competencies in teaching students with special needs in Korea. (12.1 %, rank 13/14 , 2018) Download Indicator
Modifying lessons for students with special needs is a source of stress for a share of primary education teachers in Korea. (11.2 %, rank 13/14 , 2018) Download Indicator
The difference in the share of teachers for whom modifying lessons for students with special needs is a source of stress is smaller than 6 percentage points in primary compared to lower secondary education. (4.6 % points, rank 10/11 , 2018) Download Indicator
Teaching in multicultural settings
Korea has a smaller share of teachers feeling they can cope with the challenges of a multicultural classroom "quite a bit" or "a lot" in teaching a culturally diverse class. (30.9 %, rank 49/50 , 2018) Download Indicator
In Korea, less teachers have at least 10% of students whose first language is different from the language of instruction in their class. (3.7 %, rank 46/50 , 2018) Download Indicator
Classroom management
In Korea, more teachers report a high level of need for professional development in student behaviour and classroom management. (27.8 %, rank 4/50 , 2018) Download Indicator
Teachers' satisfaction with their jobs
A larger proportion of teachers believe that the teaching profession is valued in society. (67 %, rank 4/50 , 2018) Download Indicator
The share of teachers who think that the teaching profession is valued by society in primary education is especially high in Korea. (60.1 %, rank 3/14 , 2018) Download Indicator
In Korea, the share of primary education teachers who report being satisfied with the terms of their teaching contract apart from salary is relatively small. (64.2 %, rank 10/14 , 2018) Download Indicator
In Korea, teachers who report being more satisfied with the terms of their teaching contract, apart from salary, in primary compared to lower secondary level. (10.5 % points, rank 1/10 , 2018) Download Indicator
In primary education, the share of teachers reporting there is a collaborative culture characterised by mutual support is smaller in Korea compared to other OECD and partner countries with available data. (83 %, rank 13/14 , 2018) Download Indicator
In Korea, a small share of primary education teachers report that their school provides staff with opportunities to actively participate in school decisions. (79.2 %, rank 11/14 , 2018) Download Indicator
The proportion of primary education teachers for whom having too much administrative work is a source of stress in is especially low in Korea. (42.4 %, rank 10/14 , 2018) Download Indicator
Teachers' engagement, motivation and drive
When deciding to become a teacher, a small share of teachers report that providing a contribution to society was of 'moderate importance' or 'high importance'. (79.7 %, rank 46/50 , 2018) Download Indicator
Teachers’ working conditions, mobility and risk of attrition
In Korea, the proportion of teachers who have a permanent contract in primary education is one of the largest among all OECD and partner countries with available data. (98.6 %, rank 1/14 , 2018) Download Indicator
In primary education, the percentage of full-time teachers in Korea is relatively high compared to other OECD and partner countries with available data. (97.2 %, rank 1/14 , 2018) Download Indicator
General findings
- Across OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS, teachers are 44 years old and principals are 52 years old, on average. Furthermore, 20% of principals across the OECD are aged 60 and above.
- In the OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS, 47% of principals are women, compared to 68% of teachers.
Visualisations



- In OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS, 65% of teachers report frequently calming students who are disruptive and 84% report frequently explaining how new and old topics are related.
- During a typical lesson, teachers spend 78% of classroom time on actual teaching and learning, on average in the OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS.
- In the past five to ten years, classroom time spent on actual teaching and learning has decreased in about half of the countries and economies participating in TALIS.
- 84% of teachers report having control over determining course content in their class, on average across in OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS.
- 81% of teachers say that they work in a collaborative school culture characterised by mutual support, on average in OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS. Furthermore, 59% of principals took actions on a regular basis to support co-operation among teachers to develop new teaching practices in the 12 months prior to the survey.
- On average in OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS, only 21% of teachers report participating in collaborative professional learning at least once a month and 28% engage in team-teaching with the same frequency.
- About half of teachers in the OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS "frequently" or "always" let students use ICT for projects or class work, but 25% of school principals report that delivery of quality instruction in their school is hindered by a shortage or inadequacy of digital technology for instruction.
- In the OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS, 27% of teachers work in classes with at least 10% of students with special needs (i.e. those for whom a special learning need has been formally identified because they are mentally, physically, or emotionally disadvantaged). But, 32% of school principals report that delivery of quality instruction in their school is hindered by a shortage of teachers with competence in teaching students with special needs.
Visualisations



- During their initial education and training, 79% of teachers in the OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS were instructed on subject content, pedagogy and classroom. Only 42% of teachers report having participated in some kind of formal or informal induction when they joined their current school.
- In the OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS, taking part in some kind of in-service training is commonplace among teachers and principals, with 94% of teachers and 99% of principals attending at least one professional development activity in the year prior to the survey.
Visualisations



- Across OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS, 26% of teachers "agree" or "strongly agree" with the statement that their profession is valued in society. Between 2013 and 2018, the percentage of teachers reporting that the profession is valued in society has increased in almost half of the countries and economies with available data.
- Nine out of ten teachers and 95% of school leaders report that, all in all, they are satisfied with their job, on average in OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS.
- 39% of teachers and 47% of school leaders report being satisfied with their salaries, on average in OECD countries and economies.
Visualisations



- Across OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS, 82% of teachers have a permanent contract while 12% of teacher are employed on contracts of one year or less.
- 18% of teachers report experiencing stress in their work "a lot", on average in OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS. 49% of teachers report that having too much administrative work is a source of stress they experience at work "quite a bit" or "a lot".
- A quarter of teachers report that they would like to leave teaching within the next five years, on average across the OECD countries and economies participating in TALIS. Furthermore, 14% of teachers age 50 or would like to leave teaching in the next five years.
Visualisations



- Only 10% of teachers report that they have never received feedback in their schools. On average across the OECD, the forms of feedback most commonly used are based on classroom observations and students' school-based and classroom-based results.
- 71% of teachers who received feedback in the 12 months prior to the survey report that it had a positive impact on their teaching practice. In all countries and economies participating in TALIS, teachers who report receiving feedback based on multiple methods are more likely to find that the feedback they received had a positive impact on their teaching.
- The proportion of teachers who work in schools where appraisal can result in a salary increase or financial bonus is 55% in schools where school management has responsibility over salaries. In schools where school management does not have responsibility over salaries, the proportion is only 30%.
Visualisations



- The proportion of female teachers represents over three quarters of the primary teaching force (TALIS average 78%), which is higher than the proportion in lower secondary education of 63%.
- Less than half of teachers (46% on average) cited receiving formal training in facilitating transitions from early childhood education to primary education. However, a slightly smaller share of teachers (38%) said they felt well or very well prepared in this area.
- Thirty-seven percent (37%) of teachers report modifying lessons for students with special needs is a source of stress "quite a bit" or "a lot" in primary in contrast to 29% in lower secondary.
- Teachers in upper secondary education reported being involved in fewer collaborative activities than their peers in lower secondary education. Teaching jointly as a team in the same class shows significant decreases among teachers in upper secondary (5 percentage points difference).
- Almost a quarter of teachers (23%) in upper secondary education stated they would like to leave teaching in the next five years. Teachers satisfied with their salaries and terms of employment, and who consider the school provides opportunities to engage in discussion and has a collaborative culture are less likely to state they will leave teaching.
Visualisations







All rankings for individual variables are compiled on the basis of OECD and G20 countries for which data are available. The OECD average includes only OECD countries which are listed here: http://www.oecd.org/about/membersandpartners/
Reference years displayed in the Education GPS correspond to the most common year of reference among countries for which data is available on each variable. Data for the latest available year is preferred and some countries may have provided data refering to a more recent or late year. To know more about possible exceptions on data please click on the "Download Indicator" link on each variable. When a year of reference corresponds to a school year encompassing two years, the reference reads as follows: 2018 for school year 2017/2018.
*TALIS averages are based on all countries participating in the TALIS survey, including partner countries and economies. This explains the difference between the OECD average and the TALIS averages. Data from the TALIS survey and Education at a Glance (EAG) may differ. See Annex E of the TALIS technical report and Annex 3 of EAG 2021 for more details about the data collections.
B-S-J-Z (China) refers to the four PISA-participating provinces/municipalities of the People's Republic of China: Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu and Zhejiang.
For additional notes, please refer to annexes in the list of links below the introductory country profile text.