Country
Data profiles:
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
ECEC staff, leaders and their working conditions (Starting Strong Survey 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
ECEC staff, leaders and their working conditions (Starting Strong Survey 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
ECEC staff, leaders and their working conditions (Starting Strong Survey 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
ECEC staff, leaders and their working conditions (Starting Strong Survey 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
ECEC staff, leaders and their working conditions (Starting Strong Survey 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
ECEC staff, leaders and their working conditions (Starting Strong Survey 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
ECEC staff, leaders and their working conditions (Starting Strong Survey 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
ECEC staff, leaders and their working conditions (Starting Strong Survey 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2017) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance in Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu and Zhejiang (PISA 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2019) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2018) |
Profile View

Select first some countries to compare, choose the charts you wish to display and customise them.
Student performance in science
The long term change in science mean performance over the period of participation of Malaysia in PISA shows one of the strongest increases among PISA-participating countries and economies. (7 PISA Score, rank 6/34 , 2018) Download Indicator
Student performance in mathematics
The difference between boys' and girls' in mathematics performance is among the highest compared to other countries and economies participating in PISA. (7 PISA Score, rank 10/45 , 2018) Download Indicator
The long term change in maths performance over the period of participation of Malaysia in PISA shows one of the strongest increases among PISA-participating countries and economies. (13 PISA Score, rank 4/38 , 2018) Download Indicator
Fields of education
The percentage of 15 year-old boys expecting to work as ICT professionals at age 30 is one of the smallest among countries and economies participating in PISA. (2 %, rank 69/78 , 2018) Download Indicator
School climate
A large share of 15 year-old students never arrived late for school in the two weeks prior to the PISA test. (63.1 %, rank 8/76 , 2018) Download Indicator
Students in Malaysia are one of the most co-operative, compared to other PISA-participating countries and economies. (0.51 PISA Index, rank 3/77 , 2018) Download Indicator
Students in Malaysia are one of the most competitive, compared to other PISA-participating countries and economies. (0.39 PISA Index, rank 6/77 , 2018) Download Indicator
Student well-being
A large proportion of students reported always feeling sad in Malaysia, compared to other PISA-participating countries and economies. (16.1 %, rank 2/72 , 2018) Download Indicator
In Malaysia, 15-year-old students have a strong fear of failure. (0.34 PISA Index, rank 7/77 , 2018) Download Indicator
Students' engagement, drive and self-beliefs
A small share of students disagreed or strongly disagreed that 'your intelligence is something about you that you can't change very much'. (41.2 %, rank 69/78 , 2018) Download Indicator
Fifteen-year-old students in Malaysiabelieve less in their own ability to perform, especially facing adversity, compared to other PISA-participating countries and economies. (-0.22 PISA Index, rank 70/77 , 2018) Download Indicator
Bullying
Compared to other PISA-participating countries and economies, the percentage of students who reported being bullied (includes any type of bullying act) at least a few times a month is one of the highest. (35.7 %, rank 9/78 , 2018) Download Indicator
Performance and socio-economic status
The percentage of students who have no clear idea about their future job among disadvantaged students is one of the smallest. (9.5 %, rank 75/78 , 2018) Download Indicator
Among disadvantaged students, the percentage of those who have no clear idea about their future job is one of the smallest compared to other countries and economies. (8.2 %, rank 74/78 , 2018) Download Indicator
General findings
- Reading literacy is defined as students' capacity to understand, use, evaluate, reflect on and engage with texts in order to achieve one's goals, develop one's knowledge and potential, and participate in society.
- Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu and Zhejiang (China) and Singapore scored significantly higher in reading than all other countries/economies that participated in PISA 2018. Estonia, Canada, Finland and Ireland were the highest-performing OECD countries in reading.
- Some 77% of students, on average across OECD countries, attained at least Level 2 proficiency in reading. At a minimum, these students are able to identify the main idea in a text of moderate length, find information based on explicit, though sometimes complex, criteria, and reflect on the purpose and form of texts when explicitly directed to do so. Over 85% of students in Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu and Zhejiang (China), Canada, Estonia, Finland, Hong Kong (China), Ireland, Macao (China), Poland and Singapore performed at this level or above.
- Around 8.7% of students, on average across OECD countries, were top performers in reading, meaning that they attained Level 5 or 6 in the PISA reading test. At these levels, students are able to comprehend lengthy texts, deal with concepts that are abstract or counterintuitive, and establish distinctions between fact and opinion, based on implicit cues pertaining to the content or source of the information. In 20 education systems, including those of 15 OECD countries, over 10% of 15-year-old students were top performers.
Visualisations



- Mathematics literacy is defined as students' capacity to formulate, employ and interpret mathematics in a variety of contexts. It includes reasoning mathematically and using mathematical concepts, procedures, facts and tools to describe, explain and predict phenomena.
- On average across OECD countries, 76% of students attained Level 2 or higher in mathematics. At a minimum, these students can interpret and recognise, without direct instructions, how a (simple) situation can be represented mathematically (e.g. comparing the total distance across two alternative routes, or converting prices into a different currency). However, in 24 countries and economies, more than 50% of students scored below this level of proficiency.
- Around one in six 15-year-old students in Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu and Zhejiang (China) (16.5%), and about one in seven students in Singapore (13.8%), scored at Level 6 in mathematics, the highest level of proficiency that PISA describes. These students are capable of advanced mathematical thinking and reasoning. On average across OECD countries, only 2.4% of students scored at this level.
Visualisations



- Science literacy is defined as the ability to engage with science-related issues, and with the ideas of science, as a reflective citizen. A scientifically literate person is willing to engage in reasoned discourse about science and technology, which requires the competencies to explain phenomena scientifically, evaluate and design scientific enquiry, and interpret data and evidence scientifically.
- On average across OECD countries, 78% of students attained Level 2 or higher in science. At a minimum, these students can recognise the correct explanation for familiar scientific phenomena and can use such knowledge to identify, in simple cases, whether a conclusion is valid based on the data provided. More than 90% of students in Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu and Zhejiang (China) (97.9%), Macao (China) (94.0%), Estonia (91.2%) and Singapore (91.0%) achieved this benchmark.
Visualisations



- In 11 countries and economies, including the OECD countries Australia, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Japan, Korea, Norway and the United Kingdom, average performance was higher than the OECD average while the relationship between socio-economic status and reading performance was weaker than the OECD average.
- In spite of socio-economic disadvantage, some students attain high levels of academic proficiency. On average across OECD countries, one in ten disadvantaged students was able to score in the top quarter of reading performance in their countries (known as academic resilience), indicating that disadvantage is not destiny. In Australia, Canada, Estonia, Hong-Kong (China), Ireland, Macao (China) and the United Kingdom, all of which score above the OECD average, more than 13% of disadvantaged students were academically resilient.
- In all countries and economies that participated in PISA 2018, girls significantly outperformed boys in reading - by 30 score points, on average across OECD countries. The narrowest gender gaps (less than 20 score points) were observed in Argentina, Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu and Zhejiang (China), Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Mexico, Panama and Peru; the widest (more than 50 score points) were observed in Finland, Jordan, the Republic of North Macedonia, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
Visualisations



- Co-operation amongst students was more prevalent than competition, on average across OECD countries in 2018. Some 62% of students reported that students co-operate with each other while only 50% of students reported that their schoolmates compete with each other.
- Some 23% of students reported being bullied at least a few times a month, on average across OECD countries.
- Some 88% of students across OECD countries agreed that it is a good thing to help students who cannot defend themselves and it is wrong to join in bullying. Girls and students who were not frequently bullied were more likely to report stronger anti-bullying attitudes than boys and frequently bullied students.
- On average across OECD countries, 21% of students had skipped a day of school and 48% of students had arrived late for school in the two weeks prior to the PISA test. In Georgia, Montenegro, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, at least one in five students had skipped school at least three times during that period.
- On average across OECD countries, 67% of students reported being satisfied with their lives (students who reported between 7 and 10 on the 10-point life-satisfaction scale). Between 2015 and 2018, the share of satisfied students shrank by 5 percentage points.
- In a majority of school systems, students who expressed a greater fear of failure scored higher in reading, but reported less satisfaction with life, than students expressing less concern about failing, after accounting for the socio-economic profile of students and schools.
Visualisations





All rankings for individual variables are compiled on the basis of OECD and G20 countries for which data are available. The OECD average includes only OECD countries which are listed here: http://www.oecd.org/about/membersandpartners/
*TALIS averages are based on all countries participating in the TALIS survey, including partner countries and economies. This explains the difference between the OECD average and the TALIS average. Data from the TALIS survey and Education at a Glance (EAG) may differ. See Annex E of the TALIS technical report and Annex 3 of EAG 2019 for more details about the data collections.
B-S-J-Z (China) refers to the four PISA-participating provinces/municipalities of the People's Republic of China: Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu and Zhejiang.
For additional notes, please refer to annexes in the list of links below the introductory country profile text.