Country
Data profiles:
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2014) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
England and Northern Ireland: Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013 and 2014) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2014) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2014) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2012) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2014) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Adult skills (Survey of Adult Skills, PIAAC, 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Overview of the education system (EAG 2018) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Teachers and teaching conditions (TALIS 2013) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Student performance (PISA 2015) |
Profile View
Literacy
The mean literacy score is high compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (296 PIAAC Score, rank 1/30 , 2015) Download Indicator
Numeracy
The mean numeracy score is high compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (288 PIAAC Score, rank 1/30 , 2015) Download Indicator
Problem solving in technology-rich environments
The percentage of adults who opted out of the computer based assessment is high compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (15.9 %, rank 4/30 , 2015) Download Indicator
The percentage of adults who failed the ICT core is high compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (10.7 %, rank 1/30 , 2015) Download Indicator
The percentage of adults scoring below Level 1 in problem solving in technology-rich environments is low compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (7.6 %, rank 27/27 , 2015) Download Indicator
The percentage of adults scoring at Level 1 in problem solving in technology-rich environments is low compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (19.7 %, rank 25/27 , 2015) Download Indicator
Skills differences between age groups
The mean literacy score for young people aged between 25 and 34 is high compared to other countries participating in PIAAC. (309 PIAAC Score, rank 1/30 , 2015) Download Indicator
The mean literacy score for older adults (55-65 year-olds) is high compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (273 PIAAC Score, rank 2/30 , 2015) Download Indicator
The mean numeracy score for young people aged between 25 and 34 is high compared to other countries participating in PIAAC. (297 PIAAC Score, rank 2/30 , 2015) Download Indicator
The mean numeracy score for older adults (55-65 year-olds) is high compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (273 PIAAC Score, rank 1/30 , 2015) Download Indicator
The percentage of young adults (25-34 year-olds) scoring high (at Level 2 or 3) in problem solving in technology-rich environments is high compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (53.7 %, rank 8/27 , 2015) Download Indicator
Skills differences by gender
The mean literacy score among men is high compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (298 PIAAC Score, rank 1/30 , 2015) Download Indicator
The mean literacy score among women is high compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (295 PIAAC Score, rank 1/30 , 2015) Download Indicator
The mean numeracy score among men is high compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (294 PIAAC Score, rank 1/30 , 2015) Download Indicator
The mean numeracy score among women is high compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (282 PIAAC Score, rank 1/30 , 2015) Download Indicator
The percentage of men scoring high (at Level 2 or 3) in problem solving in technology-rich environments is high compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (40 %, rank 7/27 , 2015) Download Indicator
Skills differences by level of education
The mean literacy score for adults without upper secondary education is high compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (260 PIAAC Score, rank 1/30 , 2015) Download Indicator
The mean literacy score for adults with tertiary education is high compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (313 PIAAC Score, rank 1/30 , 2015) Download Indicator
The mean numeracy score for adults without upper secondary education is high compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (247 PIAAC Score, rank 1/30 , 2015) Download Indicator
The mean numeracy score for adults with tertiary education is high compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (308 PIAAC Score, rank 3/30 , 2015) Download Indicator
The percentage of adults without upper secondary education scoring high (at Level 2 or 3) in problem solving in technology-rich environments is high compared to other countries participating in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). (6.7 %, rank 9/26 , 2015) Download Indicator
General findings
- Literacy is defined as the ability to understand, evaluate, use and engage with written texts in order to participate in society, achieve one's goals, and develop one's knowledge and potential. As measured by the Survey of Adult Skills, literacy encompasses a range of skills, from decoding written words and sentences to understanding, interpreting and evaluating complex texts. It does not, however, involve producing text (writing). Given the growing importance of digital devices and applications as a means of generating, accessing and storing written text, reading digital texts (e.g. texts containing hyper-text and navigation features, such as scrolling or clicking on links) is an integral part of literacy.
- The average literacy score for the OECD countries participating in the assessment is 268 points. Japan (296 points) has the highest average level of proficiency in literacy followed by Finland (288 points) and the Netherlands (284 points). Chile (220 points) and Turkey (227 points) recorded the lowest average scores among countries. Jakarta (Indonesia) had an even lower average score (200 points). An adult with average literacy proficiency can successfully complete tasks that require paraphrasing, low-level inferences, and matching between the digital or printed text and information.
- The mean literacy score among 25-34 year-olds is 279 score points, 11 points higher than that for all adults (268 score points). Among the different age groups, 25-34 year-olds have the highest average literacy proficiency, while 55-64 year-olds have the lowest average proficiency (250 score points). While there are some countries/economies where 16-24 year-olds scored higher than 25-34 year-olds, the differences in proficiency between these two age groups are generally small, at less than five score points in Chile, Greece, Jakarta (Indonesia), Lithuania, Singapore and Turkey. In most countries/economies, however, 25-34 year-olds have higher average proficiency than 16-24 year-olds, with a difference of about seven points in Israel and New Zealand, and well above 10 points in England (United Kingdom), Finland and Norway. The literacy proficiency of 55-65 year-olds is particularly low in Chile, Israel, Singapore and Turkey.
- In general, proficiency in literacy peaks at around age 30.
Visualisations



- Numeracy is defined as the ability to access, use, interpret and communicate mathematical information and ideas in order to engage in and manage the mathematical demands of a range of situations in adult life.
- The average score in numeracy among the OECD countries participating in the assessment is 263 points. Japan has the highest average level of proficiency in numeracy (288 points), followed by Finland (282 points). Chile (206 points), Jakarta (Indonesia) (210 points) and Turkey (219 points) recorded the lowest average scores. An adult with average proficiency in numeracy can successfully complete tasks that require the application of two or more steps or processes involving calculating with whole numbers and common decimals, percentages and fractions; simple measurement and spatial representation; estimation; and interpreting relatively simple data and statistics in texts, tables and graphs.
- The mean numeracy score among 25-34 year-olds is 274 score points, 11 points higher than that for all adults (263 score points). Among the different age groups, 25-34 year-olds have the highest average numeracy proficiency, while 55-64 year-olds have the lowest average proficiency (246 score points).
- In general, proficiency in numeracy peaks at around age 30.
Visualisations



- Problem solving in technology-rich environments is defined as the ability to use digital technology, communication tools and networks to acquire and evaluate information, communicate with others and perform practical tasks. The survey assesses adults' ability to solve problems by establishing appropriate goals and plans, and accessing and using information through computers and computer networks.
- In nearly all countries, at least 10% of adults have trouble using digital technology, communication tools and networks to acquire and evaluate information, communicate with others and perform practical tasks. Across participating countries, 10% of adults reported having no prior computer experience and a further 4.7% of adults lack the most elementary computer skills, such as the ability to use a mouse. Only 5.4% of adults demonstrate the highest level of proficiency (Level 3) in problem solving in technology-rich environments, where tasks require the ability to use a wider range of applications in less familiar contexts, and to solve problems involving complex pathways to solutions that require navigating around impasses.
- Given that the widespread use of ICTs is a relatively recent phenomenon, younger adults were clearly in a position of relative advantage compared to older adults. On average, some 45% of 25-34 year-olds can solve more complex problems using computers (i.e. those tasks at proficiency Level 2 or 3 in the problem-solving assessment), compared to only 11% of older adults. However, proficiency in problem solving in technology-rich environments among younger adults varies widely across countries. In Chile, Greece and Turkey, between 12% and 24% of respondents scored at Level 2 or 3, compared to 55% or more in Denmark, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Singapore and Sweden, and to 67% in Finland. In New Zealand, 24% of older adults scored at Level 2 or 3, but in most other countries this share was smaller than 10%.
- In general, proficiency in problem solving in technology-rich environments peaks at around age 25.
Visualisations





All rankings for individual variables are compiled on the basis of OECD and G20 countries for which data are available. The OECD average includes only OECD countries which are listed here: http://www.oecd.org/about/membersandpartners/
*TALIS averages are based on all countries participating in the TALIS survey, including partner countries and economies. This explains the difference between the OECD average and the TALIS average. Data from the TALIS survey and Education at a Glance (EAG) may differ. See Annex E of the TALIS technical report and Annex 3 of EAG 2017 for more details about the data collections.
For additional notes, please refer to annexes in the list of links below the introductory country profile text.